NEW MATERIAL
As always, please visit https://github.com/noncoding3torus/ReferenceMaterial for the comprehensive list of videos, comments, transcripts, and a plethora of questions regarding the scientific, theological, philosophical, and biological aspects of the phenomenon. There are about 325 interviews of the major disclosure players chronologically ordered for your obsessive-compulsive consumption.
Below is a list of additions to the reference material since the last post, a new set of questions that address information inconsistencies, and new insights into some of the physics that begins to describe UAP/UFO/High-Strangeness phenomena.
VIDEO/INTERVIEW ADDITIONS SINCE 2022-03-26
Eric 2013-07-10 - Comments added
TDL 2020-07-20 42mins Hints Gary Nolan is working on a mind-altering/enhancing drug
TDL 2022-03-04 Looking for the Full interview
TDL 2020-05-21 Most important hints he has ever dropped.
NEW QUESTIONS SINCE 2022-03-26
Many of the above videos are two years old, but nobody has mentioned most of them anywhere; they seem to have appeared out of thin air. Given this author's, and others, obvious obsessiveness in this area it is highly unlikely that we missed those videos. Interviews of Tom, Lue, Eric, and Hal are routinely searched for and go back several years each time. This is just one of MANY other instances where new information is coming to light that has seemingly been around for years, even decades. This type of behavior isn't limited to Youtube or Google; it seems to be everywhere surrounding this topic. There is information that not only appears out of nowhere, but some that changes, and other information that has vanished off the face of the planet.
- Has anybody else had information "magically" appear, change, or disappear?
- New "Historical" information that apparently has been around for decades but you have never heard of it?
- Revelations that were released eons ago and you definitely would have known about it; but apparently is "Well Known" now?
- Information that changes the entire subject if it were known and would definitely have been known?
- Stuff that magically appears, changes, or disappears, but now has a plethora of evidence backing it up that you never saw?
- I would love to hear from people that have obsessed over the subject for a decade or more.
- I would also love to hear from people who were into the subject over 10 years ago and are coming back now.
- Are there any discrepancies that stand out to you?
PHYSICS INSIGHTS
A previous post regarding Lue and Tom's comments to try and determine the full spacetime metric was written. It surmised that Tom Delonge and Lue Elizondo were hinting that not only does time run both forward and backwards concurrently, but that there may be extra time dimensions.
Eric Weinstein even commented on the post here.
It was later discovered that Eric Weinstein's Geometric Unity assumes that there are at least 5 time dimensions. He talks about it here.
Later in that same video Eric Weinstein talks about the Aharonov-Bohm effect here. For your convenience, here is the Aharonov-Bohm effect wiki page
Hal Puthoff has mentioned at least twice that he favors the Bohmian interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. He stated that he is working on projects that are Bohmian. In a nutshell Bohmian Mechanics assumes that there is some type of wave that is guiding a particle to a predetermined location in a predetermined state. Bohmian mechanics assumes one forward-moving component of time.
It was decided to read-up on Dr. Aharonov because reference to his work kept popping up. It turns out that he has been a contender of multiple Nobel Prizes and has been awarded the U.S. National Science Medal. Here is a video of President Obama presenting it to him for his fundamental work in Quantum Mechanics and Weak Measurement techniques; Dr. Aharonov is very well credentialed.
While searching for information on him, the following paper IMMEDIATELY raised flags: Accommodating Retrocausality with Free Will. His paper states that there are two directions of time and that your measurements depend not only on past measurements, but future measurements. I read another of his papers and it did nothing but re-affirm the belief that Lue and Tom were in fact talking about a symmetric view of time; directly linking what they were saying to Dr. Aharonov. Dr. Aharonov's work explicitly states a Time-Symmetric, or T-Symmetric, view of quantum mechanics.
T-Symmetry, or Time-Reversal Symmetry is a fact. It is one of the few fundamental symmetries of nature and physics). It shows that anything that can happen forward in time can be played in reverse or backwards in time and the physics still works; just backwards in time. There are a few things are known to break T-Symmetry:
- Ferromagnetic Fields
- Non-CentroSymmetric Molecules
- Certain topological states in various superconductors
If you are "into the woo" or high-strangeness, then the idea of a reverse-time flow affecting the past would be somewhat similar to what Terence McKenna refers to, on a macroscopic scale, as a "strange attractor" or the transcendental object at the end of time that is pulling us towards it.
Furthermore, Gary Nolan mentioned that DNA has an expectation of the future. Such an expectation could come from the reverse-time component of a T-Symmetric view of Quantum Mechanics.
Without going too much further down that rabbit hole, the quest for more interviews from which to pull information was continued. By happenstance one of the videos that Tom Delonge appeared in re-piqued curiosity into Dr. Aharonov's work. Tom was asked in this interview if he had heard about the NASA experiments in Antarctica that showed there may be a Reverse-Time Universe that intersects with our own. Tom responds that he wishes he could tell him what he knows about the subject because it is a big deal to the UFO subject. Tom mentions opposite time, opposite physics, and opposite tech advancement. He then instructs the interviewer to "Stay on it". Here are some news articles on the subject of a mirror universe.
Coming back to Dr. Aharonov's work after a hiatus, a cursory review of papers was performed. Here is a list of all of Dr. Aharonov's papers available on ArXiv.
Please take note of the following papers:
- Quantum reality with negative-mass particles
- What is nonlocal in counterfactual quantum communication?
- Magnetic forces in the absence of a classical magnetic field
- Aharonov-Bohm effect with an effective complex-valued vector potential
- The Case of the Disappearing (and Re-Appearing) Particle
- Interaction-Free Effects Between Distant Atoms
- Quantum to Classical Transitions via Weak Measurements and Post-Selection
- Accommodating Retrocausality with Free Will
- Weak Values and Quantum Nonlocality
- Nonlocality of the Aharonov-Bohm Effect
- Multiple-time states and multiple-time measurements in quantum mechanics
- New Insights on Time-Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics
- Two-time interpretation of quantum mechanics
- The Two-State Vector Formalism of Quantum Mechanics: an Updated Review
- CAUSALITY, MEMORY ERASING AND DELAYED CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
- On a Time Symmetric Formulation of Quantum Mechanics
The very first paper he wrote that is available on ArXiv is the foundation of a T-Symmetric view of Quantum Mechanics. Later papers build upon the idea; refining it, and correcting some oversights.
The Case of the Disappearing (and Re-Appearing) Particle is surely related to Lue's comments on an electron zipping in and out of existence. This correlation put a nail in the coffin. Lue's, Tom's, Eric Weinstein's, and Hal Puthoff's comments were almost assuredly for the viewers to look into the work of Dr. Aharonov; but not all may have been intentional.
It is highly recommended to review the following experiments before reviewing Dr. Aharonov's paper CAUSALITY, MEMORY ERASING AND DELAYED CHOICE EXPERIMENTS:
- Double Slit Experiment
- Wheeler's Delayed Choice
- Quantum Eraser Experiment
- Wigner's Friend Experiment
A T-Symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics does account for most, if not all of the outcomes from those experiments. In all honestly, this author has not reviewed the paper yet, nor most of them because they were just found and their importance recognized very recently.
T-Symmetry, as highlighted by his work in the paper Accommodating Retrocausality with Free Will deals tangentially with human consciousness.
- Could the resulting causality loop from a T-Symmetric Quantum Mechanics be what is so special about our consciousness that the persons responsible for disclosure are pushing?
- Do we have mechanisms in our brains that can break T-Symmetry?
- Is the breaking of T-Symmetry what allows us to perceive a forward arrow of time?
- Is there some mechanism in our brains that suppress T-Symmetry breaking?
- Could the breaking of T-Symmetry be what is special about human consciousness?
- Could the weak force or the weak isospin component of ferromagnetism be the cause of the break?
We have magnetite, in our brains; magnetite is ferromagnetic. We have oodles of chiral/helical molecules throughout our body.
- Could magnetite or some of the chiral molecules in our cells be responsible?
If our consciousness or memory has anything to do with T-Symmetry breaking, that would immediately imply that there is a strong Quantum Mechanical component to our memory or consciousness.
Finally, as related to High-Strangeness:
- Do entities have the ability to influence our perceptions via either inducing or suppressing T-Symmetry breaking levels at will?
- Combined with other forms of temporal manipulation as highlighted by the disclosure team; could this account for the High-Strangeness surrounding the UFO/UAP or other phenomena?
- Could and would a combination of temporal manipulation combined with T-Symmetry breaking or suppression be interpreted by us as the forced telepathy that is experienced by so many people?
It is HIGHLY recommended for all readers to at least cursory review of the above-listed papers of Dr. Aharonov even if they don't immediately make sense; this author surely will. It is highly suspected that his work will soon become front-stage as the disclosure process continues because so much of his life's work seems to be so intertwined with the physics of the phenomenon.
After a review of Dr. Aharonov's papers and some time to reflect on their meanings; extended delayed-choice experiments will be devised that may be used to test some of the theories presented.
Please accept this author's sincerest apologies for taking so long to come to these conclusions; they are retrospectively very obvious. Please also accept this author's apologies for any missed hints, conclusions, or other obvious pieces of data not considered; now and in the future.
Have humility, show kindness, embrace empathy, be curious!
Submitted April 10, 2022 at 07:49AM by _throwaway_thekey https://ift.tt/fd0sPqE
No comments:
Post a Comment