Nazca Mummies English Resume

Hey guys, I've written down the main topics of the congress (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fzPs-cdiik) that happened in The National Congress of Peru, in Lima to presente the results of 1 year of research from varied scientific fields performed by scientists in 5 countries, Spain, Canada, Sri Lanka, Russia and Peru, and the Press conference (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFNCtp-KcK8) The specimens were found between Palpa and Nazca. I'm gonna try to give you a resume of what it was about. The event was covered by the Peruvian, French, American, Uruguayan and Mexican press. The project’s website (https://www.the-alien-project.com/en/) in english.

Spanish is not my native language and neither my english, so excuse me for possible mistakes. 

___

The meeting was mediated by Armando Villanueva, a congressman (His page (http://www.congreso.gob.pe/congresistas2016/ArmandoVillanuevaM/) on the Peruvian Congress’s website). 

___

The firs person to speak is Thierry Jamin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thierry_Jamin), the president of Inkari, which is an institution fighting in Peru for the preservation of the Inka heritage. From what I understood the Inkari institution helped to reach some scientific institutions about the finding, and it seems they are taking care of the corpses 

___

Then we have Raymond Salas, expert in tomography and radiology. He did some images of the mummy called Wawita, which is considered an infant, his objectives were to describe the tomography scans, evaluate the conservation state of the object, diagnose possible causes for the being's death, estimate the sexual identity, and check if there was some form of artificial modification on the body.
His analyses follows as such: Three fingers on hands and feet, deteriorated specimen, large skull, big eye sockets, the internal organs were removed from the body. Skull volume capacity 1050 cc which is 19% above the normal of 850 cc.
Originally the specimen had 5 fingers but 2 were were mutilated (thumb and pinky), same thing with the feet. He speculates that most likely they removed the fingers for ritual purposes around 750 years ago while the specimen was alive.
About the mummy called Maria: Fetal position, 3 fingers on hands and feet, no hair, no ears, apparently mammal glands, belly button scar, human like coronal sutures but merged, skull capacity of 1650 cc which is 19% above the normal of 1400cc (I believe the normal value changed according to the age while alive of the specimen). Still some brain mass was left inside the skull, eye sockets of normal size 1041mm. Teeth in bad state, but the specimen has the third molar, which indicates that it was an adult. Post mortem jaw dislocation of 9 mm due to gravity (an indication of authenticity),12 ribs, Laringe, Traquea, Heart, Diafragma, 5 joints on each finger, hands and feet, natural death. 

___

Following Clara Ines Martinez, a forensic biochemistry: She proceeds to analyse the results of a DNA research of the specimens comparing it with Human DNA.

Lose pieces results:
Head 1010-30 A.C.
All the ADN that was found is human and it dates to 1050 A.C. 
Hand, might have human ADN contamination, 7000 years old, 3 labs found the same conclusion regarding the age of the hand. 
No caborno 14 or ADN research on the small bodies yet.
Maria’s ADN analysis resulted a 23,8% compatible with the human ADN

Wawita resulted in 25,6%.

Genome Graphic Comparison (https://imgur.com/RLw96xg)

___

José de la Cruz Rio Lopez, Biologist at the Inkari institute, results of a tomography two specimens.

Josefina: Organs intact, humanoid form with reptile characteristics, no hair, no ears, no nose, no nipples, reptile skin. 58.5 cm tall

Big head and elongated skull, retractable neck, 3 fingers with claws dinosaur like, bird feet like, unisexualism or gonochory (two distinct sexes in one individual organism), oviparous reproduction, liquid feeding through suction, the oral aperture is 15mm of longitude, no lips, no muscles or teeth, bipedal, body symmetry.
Three openings on the skull behind the eyes, on the temporal region, never seen in any of the cataloged animal species found on earth so far. 
Through a comparison of size skulls and cerebral capacity the conclusion is that this specimen is a 
macrocephaly creature. 
It’s clavicles are united, which is a characteristic of some dinosaurs and birds.
3 symmetric eggs inside, hollow bones like birds.

Josefina tomography scans, illustrations and comparative pictures (https://imgur.com/a/o69aFL3)

Maria: 1.70cm, no hair, no ears, small nose, 3 fingers with 5 joints, big eyes

Tomography scan (https://imgur.com/qIOgj74)

___

I couldn’t really understand the guy’s name here, he is a genome scientist and works with the Abraxas Group (http://www.abraxasintelligence.com)  which worked together with a canadian institute called Cen4gen (https://cen4gen.org/).

Presenting molecule analysis on the tridactyles (three fingers) specimens. 
Goals of the research:
Identification of the specimens by genomic and bioinformatics of massive sequencing of data.
Estimate the similarities with the human DNA.
Sample results percentage with human DNA:
Victoria - 14.29/15.26% 
Lose hand - 97.69%
He proceeds to speak a lot about technical procedures explaining that to fraud that kind of DNA structure would be impossible, they've tested 2 different parts of the same body of Victoria and achieved the same results.

___

José de Jesús Salce - Forensic Doctor
A technical resume of the previous results.
About Josefina, the one with 3 eggs: Harmonious body, anatomical integration of anthropomorphic form, structural integrity compatible and continuous, biological specimen in its anatomy and natural physiognomy shape. No indications of artificial manipulation of the bodies, it’s was a biological functional entity.
The orbital cavities would provide the being with more than 180 degrees vision. 
Metal plaque encrusted on the chest apparently to fix vertebral injuries, he points out the implant fits perfectly with the bone and it was not fixated by any known means, and no scar of incision was found. 
Separation of the last vertebras due to natural process of pregnancy, a natural physiological response, another very strong indication that this being was alive, and it’s not a fraud. 
He also points out marks on the femur junctions that were created by use, that couldn’t possibly be reproduced by artificial means, but only by natural means of usage throughout years.
Only one bone forming the forearm.

Two scans and resume text of results (https://imgur.com/a/IFitDLi).

___

Alfredo Candia, Archeologist, criticises the whole procedure, claiming that the extraction of the mummies from the original site was done illegally, the samples were sent outside of the country illegally, and there is no precise information about the site where the corpses were found, therefore no context. So he questions the veracity of the whole thing due to the absence of more info on the location of the site, claiming that it should’ve been done legally through the archeologists that represents the Peruvian government (His university).  

___

Peter Van Daalen, archeologist - Compliments the exposed methodology of the research, but claims that they cannot assert with precision these results without the context of the site where the mummies were found. What kind of materials were inside the tomb and so on, reinforces the illegal aspect of the extraction of the specimens and the lack of participation by legal authorities.

___

Another archeologist that I couldn’t quite grasp his name, speaks a while with the mic off. He then congratulates all the institutions that held an interest on the subject, says that a lot of times the peruvian institutions lost evidences due to the fact they were not obtained by legal means hence the researches that should’ve been done were not, criticises the bureaucracy of the whole process, and then says that the institutions responsible for the present researches saved the evidence by handing them directly to science. 

___

Dmitry Gavier (Im not sure about his name) from St. Petersburg University,

About Maria, carbono 14 resulted in 1750 years old, both samples have the same ADN therefore from the same body, the specimen didn’t match any of the known specimens on Earth. The samples were covered by a very fine powder that had to go through a technological process since it’s not a natural powder found in nature. Maria had 30/35 years old.
Josefina - Very different shape than the human body, eye sulks smaller than humans, 9 mm depth, absence of nose indicates that this being had no need to warm the air before it entering in his body. 
The pelvis is very different from what science knows, no Coccyx. 

And embryo image was obtained by scanning of one of the eggs. 

Scans and pictures of the bodies and eggs (https://imgur.com/a/u4sxtQ8).

___

Congressmen Armando - Concludes that this topic is of utter importance for human kind, and the Peruvian government will take legal actions to promote the national and international research on the topic.

___

Jaime Maussan from Tercer Milenio interview some of the participants after the event - 

Jois mantilla, Peruvian journalist:
People will take their own conclusions through the information shared here today. On the critics by the peruvian archeologists: they were told about it and they did not act, they didn’t show interest at the time so we had to call international archeologists to do what they didn’t want, all the illegal actions taken here would’ve been avoided if they had done what they should’ve. Hopefully they will assume the responsibility from now on. 
Congressmen - Reinforces the need to gather the scientific community to support the ongoing research. The Peruvian government is gonna take measures to make these mummies a national patrimony.

___

Press Conference:

Congressmen Since it’s such a controversial theme we made this meeting, which became an international table.

All of the research was financially sponsored by private means. 

Since national professionals didn’t want to get involved with the topic they had to look for international personal. 

The creatures have no similarity with any earthly species. Neither it seems to have evolved from a previous earthly biological being. It was never described by science literature.

A french reporter asks about what is been done towards converting this finding into an official world heritage by UNESCO and states that the French government is interested in helping the cause. 

An American reporter asks if there are similarities between the specimens, and the answer is very little, and further studies have to be done to understand if there are any kind of evolutionary links.

The strongest arguments to sustain the veracity of the findings are the pregnancy of Josefina and the DNA analysis that have been done so far.

Congressmen concludes by setting the goal to transform the finding into a world heritage.  

___

Feel free to ask me questions and I hope I’ve helped a bit to clarify the topic.

Submitted November 25, 2018 at 10:05PM by _Lus https://ift.tt/2P2Uiee