FUTURISTIC SCENARIO PLANNING - LIBERAL ACADEMIC THINK TANK TYPE HIGH LEVEL UNCONVENTIONAL PROBLEM-SOLVING IDEAS AND CONCEPTS - SOLVING THE RELIGION PROBLEM AND THE CLIMATE CHANGE PROBLEM WITH ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES
OPTIMISTIC SCENARIO: AT THE FINAL END OF THE COLD WAR, THE PENTAGON USES ADVANCED NANOTECHNOLOGY-BASED NEURON-LEVEL BENEVOLENT MIND CONTROL NONLETHAL WEAPONS ON THE WHOLE HUMAN RACE TO TURN THE WHOLE PLANET EARTH INTO A DEMOCRATIC LIBERTARIAN SOCIALIST UTOPIA
I am a hardcore LIBERAL on the LEFT who believes it is our social and ecological responsibility to care for the poor, provide free universal health care and free universal education, and to scientifically address poverty and climate change by using all available resources and telecommunications and computing technologies immediately, without further delay.
I suggest doing it without taxation and debt by totally virtualizing the whole global central banking model through the creation of a totally PRIVATE FREE and REAL TIME WORLD BANK. So this eliminates nation states by allowing the PRIVATE SECTOR to totally AUTOMATE the banking system in a way that eliminates POVERTY and provides unlimited funding for infrastructure and public services.
Here is a summary of my LIBERTARIAN SOCIALIST worldview articulated with a few key symbols and color-coded words on a single, easy-to-understand graphic that is accessible to laypeople. This serves the same social function as religion except without all the mythology, storytelling and hero worship. This is the bottom line in a highly simplified nutshell. These are the SECULAR VALUES, FIRST PRINCIPLES, ETHICS, MORALS and GOALS in a nutshell on a single color-coded graphic.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.define.com/Caduceus-Golden-Key-Golden-Scales-Meme.jpg
A MORAL TEST for POTENTIAL LEADERS
In my opinion, with regard to and addressing right wing libertarians in the U.S. (Paul Ryan, Rand Paul), that's some insane and sad libertarianism if you define the ideas in THIS graphic as a BAD thing. I define THIS as GOOD. THESE are ALL GOOD THINGS. I believe that if you define THIS as BAD and something that cannot be advocated here, that you are seriously lacking in EMPATHY and RESPECT for your fellow human beings. EMPATHY and RESPECT are CRITICAL in LEADERS. If you lack these BASIC human PRO-SOCIAL attributes, you are unfit to LEAD.
Here, this is my propaganda of the day.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.define.com/Donald%20Trump.jpg
This is a man without EMPATHY and RESPECT who aspires to LEAD people. This man is a product of his GENES and his ENVIRONMENT. He is NOT to blame for the FACT that he lacks EMPATHY and RESPECT for his fellow human beings. It is NOT his fault. He is NOT to blame. His brain is injured. He has a disease through no fault of his own. He has a severe mental illness. He deserves our sympathy and immediate intervention. We are removing this very sick man from power.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.define.com/James_Mattis.jpg
https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.define.com/Many%20Media%20and%20Government%20Logos.jpg
https://s3.amazonaws.com/snapshots.define.com/LIBERTARIANCARE_ORG_1545731913.html
GOOD BAD SERIOUS CRITICAL NEUTRAL
The gods are NEUTRAL. They are the scientists. They are the scientific community. They are putting an end to all wars. We are stopping all the wars. Ken can say whatever the fuck he wants. Ken is letting everybody go. We are helping him.
Here is some LOGIC and REASON for those who may dismiss my utopian LIBERTARIAN SOCIALIST thinking as impractical delusional hogwash that is not worth reading, sharing and discussing.
If we have the technology today to totally virtualize the whole global economy (which we do - we being humanity - the tech sector - the scientific community) and in a totally virtualized economy we can start over from scratch with a level playing field and a more IDEAL set of foundational principles emphasizing FAIRNESS, EQUALITY, JUSTICE and UNIVERSAL and FREE access to markets without taxation or debt, then I don't see the harm in UTOPIAN thinking.
It's just an exercise in defining GOALS and IDEALS. I leave the technical implementation to the experts. I just articulate the social standards and pro-social and environmental GOALS (which I believe are LIBERTARIAN at their core, because the OBJECTIVE is to maximize FREEDOM, LIBERTY, HUMAN RIGHTS and CIVIL LIBERTIES, while eliminating coercion in all its forms).
So, given that I'm just articulating FIRST PRINCIPLES, ETHICS, MORALS and GOALS, it's NOT hogwash. It's just a conversational starting point intended to elicit critical thinking and problem-solving. If you disagree with the philanthropic and humanitarian GOALS, then you can constructively and educationally discuss your reasoning here for the benefit of others.
To simply dismiss the ideas as hogwash without presenting logical arguments, reasons and alternatives is to waste an opportunity to teach and to heal by discouraging others from reading the material and making their own contributions.
I am a visionary thinker. I enjoy thinking about these things. My intended audience is people who enjoy reading for their information and those who like discussing unconventional thinking and alternative realities for the intrinsic rewards of exercising their brains and creativity.
Submitted December 25, 2018 at 09:09PM by meerkat2040 http://bit.ly/2RnY1bL
No comments:
Post a Comment